4.8 Article

Yttrium-Doped Hydroxyapatite Membranes with High Proton Conductivity

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 24, 期 10, 页码 1738-1743

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cm203355h

关键词

hydroxyapatite; hydrothermal synthesis; proton conductors; membranes; coatings

资金

  1. NSF [CMMI-0856128]
  2. DOE through the Laboratory for Laser Energetics [DE-FC03-92SF19460]
  3. University of Rochester
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [0856128] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fully dense yttrium-doped hydroxyapatite membranes were synthesized having aligned crystal domains that span the membrane thickness. The membranes were grown by multistage hydrothermal crystallization onto a palladium substrate electrochemically seeded with hydroxyapatite nano-crystals. Synthesis conditions were chosen to promote the alignment of the crystallographic c-axis normal to the palladium substrate to promote proton transport through the membrane. The palladium substrate was used as an electrode for electrochemical characterization of the membrane, with platinum as the counter electrode. The measured proton conductivity of the novel membranes approaches 10(-2) S/cm at 700 degrees C, a value higher by a factor of >100 than previously recorded for any apatite ceramic at similar conditions. The enhancement in proton conductivity is effects of yttrium doping and the novel membrane microstructure that eliminates grain boundary resistance to proton transport. With a hydrogen atmosphere at the palladium electrode and dry air at the counter electrode, open circuit voltages of 0.9-1.0 V were measured. The high open circuit voltage indicates that there is minimal electronic conductivity through the membrane and that the membrane is a barrier maintaining separation of hydrogen and air. The high proton conductivity and good barrier properties suggest that the novel membranes may be effective in fuel cells and other electrochemical devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据