4.8 Article

Theoretical Investigation of Triscarbazole Derivatives As Host Materials for Blue Electrophosphorescence: Effects of Topology

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 23, 期 23, 页码 5223-5230

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cm2022449

关键词

blue OLEDs; ambipolar hosts; triscarbazoles; singlet-triplet energy differences; density functional theory (DFT) calculations

资金

  1. Solvay
  2. National Science Foundation [DMR-0120967]
  3. CRIF [CHE-0946869]
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Chemistry [0946869] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have investigated the electronic structure of triscarbazole derivatives used as host materials in blue phosphorescent organic light-emitting diodes. The results of density functional theory calculations show that, in the case of triscarbazole derivatives where the carbazole units are linked via C C bonds, the frontier molecular orbital energies are modulated by strong molecular orbital interactions between the central and side carbazole units. On the other hand, in the case of triscarbazoles linked via C-N bonds, the combination of inductive effects and molecular orbital interactions tunes the frontier level energies and, interestingly, gives rise to an ambipolar character. In the C-N linked systems, the lowest triplet states are characterized mainly by an electronic transition localized within the central carbazole, while in the C C linked compounds it is the longest oligo-para-phenyl segment to be found in the chemical structure that defines the lowest triplet transition. When the N-H group of the central carbazole unit is replaced by other groups [0, S, CH, C(CH3)(2) C(CH3)(CF3), and C(CF3)(2)], the HOMO/LUMO energies fluctuate substantially in the absence of the side carbazoles, but these variations are significantly reduced in their presence; also, the singlet triplet energy differences decrease substantially when going from the isolated central unit to the triscarbazole-like derivatives.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据