4.8 Article

Ordered Hierarchical Nanostructured Carbon as a Highly Efficient Cathode Catalyst Support in Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 21, 期 5, 页码 789-796

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cm801467y

关键词

-

资金

  1. WCU Program
  2. BK21 Program
  3. Korean Basic Science Institute at Jeonju, Chuncheon
  4. Daejeon for SEM, TEM, and XRD measurements
  5. Ministry of Education, Science & Technology (MoST), Republic of Korea [R31-2008-000-10035-0] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea [과06B1510] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ordered hierarchical nanostructured carbon (OHNC) has been fabricated through inverse replication of silica template and explored for the first time to support high loading of Pt nanoparticles as cathode catalyst in proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFC). The superb characteristics such as ordered hierarchical nanostructure, large surface area, and mesopore volume enable the OHNC to support high loading (60 wt %) of Pt nanoparticles with uniform dispersion and small particle size. Compared to carbon black Vulcan XC-72 (VC)-supported Pt (60 wt %), the OHNC-supported one has exhibited greatly enhanced catalytic activity toward oxygen reduction reaction by ca. 53-88% and considerably improved PEMFC performance. More importantly, unlike the VC-supported Pt catalysts, the OHNC-supported Pt (40 or 60 wt %) outperforms the OHNC-supported Pt (20 wt %) even at a low catalyst loading of 0.2 mg Pt/cm(2) in the cathode, which represents a significant breakthrough in fuel cell technology because of the expectable marked reduction in fabricating cost of the supported Pt catalyst and the corresponding system weight and considerably improved fuel cell performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据