4.8 Article

Preparation of Mesoporous Pt-Ru Alloy Fibers with Tunable Compositions via Evaporation-Mediated Direct Templating (EDIT) Method Utilizing Porous Anodic Alumina Membranes

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 21, 期 14, 页码 3414-3423

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cm9011926

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT)
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [19850031]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19850031] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Synthesis of composition-controlled mesoporous Pt-Ru alloy fibers by a dual-templating method (Yamauchi et al. J. Am. Client. Soc., 2008, 130, 5426-5427) is demonstrated using lyotropic liquid crystals (LLCs) as mesostructural direct templates and porous anodic alumina membranes (PAAMs) as morphological direct templates. The LLCs, including Pt and Ru species, were formed from diluted precursor solutions inside PAAM channels via the evaporation-mediated direct templating (EDIT) method. For all Pt-Ru compositions, the tubular mesophases in the LLCs were stacked like donuts within the PAAM channels because of the confined effect. After metal deposition by the vapor infiltration method of dimethylamineborane (DMAB) and subsequent removal of both surfactants and PAAM, mesoporous Pt-Ru fibers with various compositions were successfully prepared. Both the alloy state and the mesoporous structures were Fully characterized by high-resolution scanning electron microscopy (HR-SEM) transmission electron microscopy (TEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopic (EDS) mapping X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and electrochemical techniques. The composition ratios of Pt and Ru in the fibers were tuned by controlling those of the used precursor solutions. The mesoporous structures in the fibers reflected the original LLC mesostructures; however, the ordering of the mesoporous structures gradually decreased with the increase in the Ru contents in the precursor solutions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据