4.8 Article

Metal-organic frameworks based on double-bond-coupled di-isophthalate linkers with high hydrogen and methane uptakes

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 20, 期 9, 页码 3145-3152

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cm800403d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Division Of Chemistry
  2. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0910761] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Solvothermal reactions of Cu(NO3)(2) with azoxybenzene-3,3',5,5'-tetracarboxylic acid (H(4)aobtc) or trans-stilbene-3,3',5,5'-tetracarboxylic acid (H(4)sbtc) give rise to two isostructural microporous metal-organic frameworks, Cu-2(abtc)(H2O)(2)center dot 3DMA (PCN-10, abtc = azobenzene-3,3',5,5'-tetracarboxylate) and Cu-2(sbtc)(H2O)(2)center dot 3DMA (PCN-11, sbtc = trans-stilbeile-3,3',5,5'-tetracarboxylate), respectively. Both PCN-10 and PCN-11 possess significant enduring porosity with Langmuir surface areas of 1779 and 2442 m(2)/g (corresponding to BET Surface areas of 1407 or 1931 m(2)/g, respectively) and contain nanoscopic cages and coordinatively unsaturated metal centers. At 77 K, 760 Torr, the excess gravimetric (volumetric) hydrogen uptake of PCN-10 is 2.34 wt% (18.0 g/L) and that of PCN-11 can reach 2.55 wt% (19.1 g/L). Gas-adsorption studies also suggest that MOFs containing C=C double bonds are more favorable than those with N=N double bond in retaining enduring porosity after thermal activation, although N=N has slightly higher H-2 affinity. The excess gravimetric (volumetric) adsorption at 77 K saturates around 20 atm and reaches values of 4.33% (33.2 g/L) and 5.05% (37.8 g/L) for PCN-10 and PCN-11, respectively. In addition to its appreciable hydrogen uptake, PCN-11 has an excess methane uptake of 17 1 cm 3 (STP)/cm(3) at 298 K and 35 bar, approaching the DOE target of 180 v(STP)/v for methane storage at ambient temperature. Thus, PCN-11 represents one of the few materials that is applicable to both hydrogen and methane storage applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据