4.3 Review

Sphingolipids and lipid rafts: Novel concepts and methods of analysis

期刊

CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS OF LIPIDS
卷 216, 期 -, 页码 114-131

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2018.08.003

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (USA) [R01AG034389, R01NS095215]
  2. National Science Foundation (USA) [NSF1615874]
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R01NS095215] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG034389] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

About twenty years ago, the functional lipid raft model of the plasma membrane was published. It took into account decades of research showing that cellular membranes are not just homogenous mixtures of lipids and proteins. Lateral anisotropy leads to assembly of membrane domains with specific lipid and protein composition regulating vesicular traffic, cell polarity, and cell signaling pathways in a plethora of biological processes. However, what appeared to be a clearly defined entity of clustered raft lipids and proteins became increasingly fluid over the years, and many of the fundamental questions about biogenesis and structure of lipid rafts remained unanswered. Experimental obstacles in visualizing lipids and their interactions hampered progress in understanding just how big rafts are, where and when they are formed, and with which proteins raft lipids interact. In recent years, we have begun to answer some of these questions and sphingolipids may take center stage in re-defining the meaning and functional significance of lipid rafts. In addition to the archetypical cholesterol-sphingomyelin raft with liquid ordered (Lo) phase and the liquid-disordered (Ld) non-raft regions of cellular membranes, a third type of microdomains termed ceramide-rich platforms (CRPs) with gel-like structure has been identified. CRPs are ceramide rafts that may offer some fresh view on the membrane mesostructure and answer several critical questions for our understanding of lipid rafts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据