4.5 Article

Isolation and Characterization of Antimicrobial Cyclic Dipeptides from Pseudomonas fluorescens and Their Efficacy on Sorghum Grain Mold Fungi

期刊

CHEMISTRY & BIODIVERSITY
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 92-100

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cbdv.201300045

关键词

Pseudomonas fluorescens; Peptides; Diketopiperazine; Antifungal metabolites; Sorghum grain mold

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology [SR/FT/LS-038/2008]
  2. University Grants Commission, New Delhi, India [41-1209/2012(SR)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study was aimed at isolation and characterization of natural antifungal compounds for grain mold, a key parasitic fungal disease of sorghum. Pseudomonas fluorescens strain isolated from rhizosphere of groundnut crop was selected as a source. Its biocontrolling ability was assessed by testing some biochemical attributes such as phosphate-solubilization, and HCN, NH3, indole-3-acetic acid, and siderophore production. The strain showed positive result for all except indole-3-acetic acid, revealing its suitability for a further study. The antibiotic-sensitivity pattern of the strain against 43 antibiotics was also established, which showed resistance to 15 antibiotics. The efficacy of P. fluorescens strain against grain mold was identified by dual culture technique. Hundred percent inhibition was found against Fusarium moniliforme, an important causative agent of this disease. The strain was fermented for secondary metabolites and extracted with AcOEt. Chromatographic separation of the extract yielded four known compounds, cyclo(L-Pro-L-Phe) (1), cyclo(trans-4-hydroxy-L-Pro-L-Leu) (2), cyclo(trans-4-hydroxy-L-Pro-L-Phe) (3), and cyclo(Gly-L-Pro) (4), which were characterized by spectral analysis and optical rotation. The crude extract, a mixture of 2 and 3, and isolated 1 were proved to be significantly effective against grain mold fungi. This is the first report on production of these cyclic dipeptides by P. fluorescens and their antagonistic properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据