4.7 Article

Recent advances in applications of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to the ana lysis of reactive drug metabolites

期刊

CHEMICO-BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS
卷 179, 期 1, 页码 25-37

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbi.2008.09.014

关键词

LC-MS/MS; Reactive metabolites; Glutathione conjugates; Accurate mass; Mass defect filter; LTQ; Q-TOF; Q-trap; LTQ-Orbitrap; Constant neutral loss scan; Precursor ion scan; Multiple reaction monitoring

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biotransformation of chemically stable compounds to reactive metabolites which can bind covalently to macromolecules, such as proteins and DNA, is considered as an undesirable feature of drug candidates. As part of an overall assessment of absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) properties, many pharmaceutical companies have put methods in place to screen drug candidates for their tendency to generate reactive metabolites and as well characterize the nature of the reactive metabolites through in vitro and in vivo studies. After identification of the problematic compounds, steps can be taken to minimize the potential of bioactivation through appropriate structural modifications. For these reasons, detection, structural characterization and quantification of reactive metabolites by mass spectrometry have become an important task in the drug discovery process. Triple quadrupole mass spectrometry is traditionally employed for the analysis of reactive metabolites. In the past 3 years, a number of new mass spectrometry methodologies have been developed to improve the sensitivity, selectivity and throughput of the analysis. This review focuses on the recent advances in the detection and characterization of reactive metabolites by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in drug discovery and development, especially through the use of linear ion trap (LTQ), hybrid triple quadrupole-linear ion trap (Q-trap) and the high resolution LTQ-Orbitrap instruments. (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据