4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Fructose and carbonyl metabolites as endogenous toxins

期刊

CHEMICO-BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS
卷 178, 期 1-3, 页码 332-339

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbi.2008.10.011

关键词

Reactive oxygen species; Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; Fructose; Inflammation; Hepatocytes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dietary fructose consumption is one of the environmental factors contributing to the development of obesity and a fatty liver (hepatic steatosis). A two-hit hypothesis has been proposed for progression of hepatic steatosis to the more serious non-alcoholic steatosis (NASH), with the first hit being hepatic steatosis, and the second hit being inflammation and associated oxidative stress caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation. As well, fructose-fed rats develop insulin resistance and serum levels of methylglyoxal, a glycolytic metabolite, are increased. Previously we reported that glyoxal-induced hepatocyte cytotoxicity could be attributed to mitochondrial toxicity as mitochondrial membrane potential was decreased and cytotoxicity was increased several orders of magnitude by low non-cytotoxic doses of H2O2 (hepatocyte inflammation model). In this study, we have assessed the toxicity of fructose towards hepatocytes and investigated the molecular cytotoxic mechanisms involved. Fructose itself was only toxic at 1.5 M, whereas 12 mM caused 50% cell death in 2 h if the hepatocytes were exposed to a non-cytotoxic dose of H2O2 continuously generated by glucose and glucose oxidase. The cytotoxic mechanism involved oxidative stress as ROS and H2O2 formation preceded cytotoxicity, and cytotoxicity was prevented by radical scavengers, lipid antioxidants and ROS scavengers. It is proposed that the highly potent Fenton derived ROS catalyse the oxidation of fructose and particularly its carbonyl metabolites glycolaldehyde, dihydroxyacetone, glyceraldehyde. The carbon radicals and glyoxal formed compromise the cell's resistance to H2O2. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据