4.7 Article

Efficacy of Siddha formulation Kalpaamruthaa in ameliorating joint destruction in rheumatoid arthritis in rats

期刊

CHEMICO-BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS
卷 176, 期 2-3, 页码 243-251

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbi.2008.07.008

关键词

Kalpaamruthaa; Semecarpus anacardium; Emblica officinalis; Lysosomal enzymes; Collagen; Glycosaminoglycans; Rheumatoid arthritis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a kind of chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease. The degradation of extracellular matrix and cartilage pave way in understanding the molecular mechanisms in RA. Degradation of cartilage is a more complex event involving the local release of metallaoproteases and lysosomal enzymes that mediate inflammation in joints and in the synovial fluid in RA. Objectives: In the present Study. the efficacy of a Siddha preparation named Kalpaamruthaa (KA) in ameliorating the disease process via markedly reducing the joint destruction was demonstrated in adjuvant induced arthritis rat model. KA consists of Semecarpus anacardium nut milk extract (SA), dried powder of Emblica officinalis fruit and honey. Material and methods: Both SA and KA were administered at dose of 150mg/kg b.wt. for 14 days after 14 days of adjuvant injection in rats. The activity of lysosomal enzymes, the level of collagen, glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) and its degradative products were analyzed in control and experimental animals. Results and conclusion: The study revealed that KA exhibited a profound reduction (p < 0.05) in the activities of lysosomal enzymes and thereby decreasing (p < 0.05) the levels of GAGs and its fractions when compared to arthritis rats. The latter was confirmed by Safrannin O staining for GAGs in the interphalangeal joints of control and experimental animals. The effect of KA was found to be improved than SA and this might be due to the combined interactions of phytoconstituents present in KA. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据