3.9 Article

Growth-rate Enhancement of High-quality, Low-loss CVD-produced Diamond Disks Grown for Microwave Windows Application

期刊

CHEMICAL VAPOR DEPOSITION
卷 20, 期 1-3, 页码 32-38

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cvde.201307058

关键词

CVD diamond growth; Dielectric losses; Microwave window; Nitrogen addition

资金

  1. Russian Government [14.B25.31.0021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of nitrogen addition on the growth rate, quality, and properties of polycrystalline diamond grown by microwave plasma assisted (MPA)CVD is investigated. Two series of experiments are performed at two different microwave power densities (40 and 110W cm(-3)) using a 2.45 GHz cylindrical microwave reactor. The results show that the beneficial effect of nitrogen is more distinct at higher microwave power densities. To investigate the properties of polycrystalline diamond grown with nitrogen addition, a thick diamond disk of 50mm diameter is grown with an addition of 50ppm nitrogen using a 2.45 GHz ellipsoidal microwave reactor. The grown diamond disk has a thermal conductivity of 17.3W cm(-1) K-1 and dielectric loss tangent of 3.7x10(-5) at a frequency of 170 GHz, and its parameters are suitable for application in microwave windows (e.g., gyrotron windows). Our results indicate that it is possible to achieve the increased (by a factor of 2.5) growth rates by nitrogen addition without significant degradation of diamond quality, and properties such as thermal conductivity and dielectric loss tangent. The effect of nitrogen addition on the MPACVD synthesis of polycrystalline diamond is investigated with the aim of growth-rate enhancement of high-quality, low-loss CVD-produced diamond disks. Experiments are performed at microwave power densities of 40 and 110 W cm(-3) using a 2.45 GHz microwave reactor. The amount of added nitrogen needed to grow CVD disks of high quality (suitable for application in microwave windows) 2.5 times faster compared with the nitrogen-free synthesis, is determined.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据