4.8 Review

Peptide supramolecular materials for therapeutics

期刊

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
卷 47, 期 20, 页码 7539-7551

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7cs00735c

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences [DE-FG02-00ER45810]
  2. Center for Bio-Inspired Energy Science (CBES), a DOE [DE-SC0000989]
  3. National Institutes of Health (National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research) [R01 DE015920]
  4. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering [R01 EB003806]
  5. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [R01 HL116577, P01 HL108795]
  6. National Science Foundation [DMR-1508731]
  7. National Cancer Institute [F5U54CA151880]
  8. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [U54CA151880] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  9. NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE [PN1EY016569] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  10. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [P01HL108795, R01HL116577] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  11. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING [R01EB003806] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  12. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH [R01DE015920] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Supramolecular assembly of peptide-based monomers into nanostructures offers many promising applications in advanced therapies. In this Tutorial Review, we introduce molecular designs to control the structure and potential biological function of supramolecular assemblies. An emphasis is placed on peptide-based supramolecular nanostructures that are intentionally designed to signal cells, either directly through the incorporation of amino acid sequences that activate receptors or indirectly by recruiting native signals such as growth factors. Additionally, we describe the use and future potential of hierarchical structures, such as single molecules that assemble into nanoscale fibers which then align to form macroscopic strings; the strings can then serve as scaffolds for cell growth, proliferation, and differentiation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据