4.8 Review

Artificial photosynthesis over graphene-semiconductor composites. Are we getting better?

期刊

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
卷 43, 期 24, 页码 8240-8254

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4cs00213j

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21173045, 20903023]
  2. Award Program for Minjiang Scholar Professorship
  3. Natural Science Foundation (NSF) of Fujian Province [2012J06003]
  4. Program for Returned High-Level Overseas Chinese Scholars of Fujian Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tremendous interest is devoted to fabricating numerous graphene (GR)-semiconductor composites toward improved conversion of solar energy, resulting from the observation that the photogenerated electrons from semiconductors (e.g., TiO2, CdS) can be readily accepted or shuttled in the two-dimensional (2D) GR sheet. Yet although the hunt is on for GR-semiconductor composite based photoredox applications that aim to exploit the remarkable electronic conductivity of GR, the work necessary to find out how it could best be harnessed to improve the photocatalytic performance of semiconductors remains scanty. In this review, we highlight a few problems associated with improving the photocatalytic performance of semiconductors via methodological coupling with GR. In particular, we address strategies for harnessing the structure and electronic conductivity of GR via strengthening the interfacial contact, optimizing the electronic conductivity of GR, and spatially optimizing the interfacial charge carrier transfer efficiency. Additionally, we provide a brief overview of assembly methods for fabricating GR-semiconductor composites with controllable film infrastructure to meet the requirements of practical photocatalytic applications. Finally, we propose that, only with the principle of designing and understanding GR-semiconductor composites from a system-level consideration, we might get better at imparting the power of GR with unique and transformative properties into the composite system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据