4.8 Review

From charge transport parameters to charge mobility in organic semiconductors through multiscale simulation

期刊

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
卷 43, 期 8, 页码 2662-2679

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3cs60319a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21290191, 21303213, 91333202]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China through 973 program [2011CB932304, 2011CB808405, 2013CB933503]
  3. Oversea Top Academic Visitor'' (OTAV) Program of the Ministry of Education of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review introduces the development and application of a multiscale approach to assess the charge mobility for organic semiconductors, which combines quantum chemistry, Kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC), and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. This approach is especially applicable in describing a large class of organic semiconductors with intermolecular electronic coupling (V) much less than intramolecular charge reorganization energy (lambda), a situation where the band description fails obviously. The charge transport is modeled as successive charge hopping from one molecule to another. We highlight the quantum nuclear tunneling effect in the charge transfer, beyond the semiclassical Marcus theory. Such an effect is essential for interpreting the paradoxical'' experimental finding that optical measurement indicated local charge'' while electrical measurement indicated bandlike''. Coupled MD and KMC simulations demonstrated that the dynamic disorder caused by intermolecular vibration has negligible effect on the carrier mobility. We further apply the approach for molecular design of n-type materials and for rationalization of experimental results. The charge reorganization energy is analyzed through decomposition into internal coordinates relaxation, so that chemical structure contributions to the intramolecular electron-phonon interaction are revealed and give helpful indication to reduce the charge reorganization energy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据