4.8 Review

Oil-water interfacial self-assembly: a novel strategy for nanofilm and nanodevice fabrication

期刊

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
卷 41, 期 3, 页码 1350-1362

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c1cs15189d

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91123006, 51133001, 21001028, 51002032, 21074023]
  2. Shanghai Science and Technology Foundation [10JC1401900]
  3. Innovative Team of Ministry of Education of China [IRT0911]
  4. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB932303]
  5. Shanghai Chenguang Foundation [11CG06]
  6. Shanghai Pujiang Program [11PJ1400300]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

How to integrate individual nanostructures into macroscopic thin films has become one of the most intriguing fields in nanoscience and nanotechnology due to the unique properties and important applications of these functional films. Since being discovered in 2004, oil-water interfacial self-assembly of nanostructures has become a novel strategy for fabrication of nanofilms. It is a powerful bottom-up approach for film fabrication due to the low cost and high efficiency, and is simple and universal for almost all low-dimensional nanostructures. In this article, we provide a critical review of the state-of-the-art research activities in this burgeoning self-assembly strategy. We first discuss the thermodynamic mechanism of the oil-water interfacial self-assembly, then the self-assembly of various low-dimensional nanostructures including nanoparticles, one-dimensional (1D) nanostructures, two-dimensional (2D) nanostructures at an oil-water interface developed so far to fabricate high-quality nanofilms. Finally, we present some progress on the construction of functional nanofilm-based nanodevices from this novel strategy based on our research. We conclude this review with critical comments on advantages and the experimental challenges, and further propose the future research and development of this self-assembly strategy for nanodevice construction (105 references).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据