4.5 Article

Seasonal Variation in Air Particulate Matter (PM10) Exposure-Induced Ischemia-Like Injuries in the Rat Brain

期刊

CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY
卷 28, 期 3, 页码 431-439

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/tx500392n

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21477070, 21377076, 21307079, 21222701]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (SRFDP) [20121401110003, 20131401110005]
  3. Program for the Top Young and Middle-aged Innovative Talents of Higher Learning Institutions of Shanxi (TYMIT) [20120201]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Epidemiological studies imply a significantly positive association between particulate matter (PM) level and ischemic stroke hospitalization: However, considering that PM10 is highly heterogeneous and Varies with season within the same location, existing experimental evidence remained low. In the present study, we first treated Wistar rats with PM10 samples collected from different seasons in Taiyuan, a typically coal-burning city of China, and determined ischemia-related markers in the cortex. The results indicated that PM10 exposure caused endothelial dysfunction, inflammatory response; and neuro-functional impairment similar to that of cerebral ischemia with season-dependent properties, and the winter sample presented the most obvious injuries. Then, we detected the chemical composition of PM10, samples followed by analysis of their correlation with the above biomarkers and found that winter PM10, characterized by higher polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and carbon load, played the major role in causing brain ischemia-like injuries among different season samples. Furthermore, by setting up an ischemic neuron model in vitro, we confirmed that winter PM10 presented the most serious aggravation on ischemia-produced injury outcome. This study provides experimental evidence for clarifying the association between season-dependent PM10 pollution in the atmospheric environment and an increased risk of ischemia-like injuries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据