4.5 Article

Proteomic analysis of diaminochlorotriazine adducts in wister rat pituitary glands and LβT2 rat pituitary cells

期刊

CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY
卷 21, 期 4, 页码 844-851

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/tx700386f

关键词

-

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [5F32NS049892] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Atrazine (ATRA) is the most commonly applied herbicide in the United States and is frequently detected in drinking water at significant levels. After oral exposure, ATRA metabolism yields diaminochlorotriazine (DACT), an electrophilic molecule that has been shown to form covalent protein adducts. This research was designed to identify ATRA-induced protein adducts formed in the pituitary gland of ATRA-exposed rats and in DACT-exposed L beta T2 rat pituitary cells. Immunohistochemistry showed diffuse cytoplasmic and nuclear staining in both pituitary sections and L beta T2 cells indicating the formation of DACT protein adducts. Protein targets from both rat pituitaries and L beta T2 cell culture were identified following twodimensional electrophoresis (2DE), immunodetection, and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry analysis. Western blots from both exposed rats and L beta T2 cells revealed over 30 DACT-modified spots that were not present in control animals. Protein spots were matched to concurrently run 2DE gels stained with Sypro Ruby, excised, and in-gel-digested with trypsin. Mass spectrometry analysis of digest peptides resulted in the identification of 19 spots and 8 unique proteins in the rats and 21 spots and 19 unique proteins in L beta T2 cells. The identified proteins present in both sample types included proteasome activator complex subunit 1, ubiquitin carboxyl -terminal hydrolase isozyme L1, tropomyosin, ERp57, and RNA-binding proteins. Each of these proteins contains active-site or solvent-exposed cysteine residues, making them viable targets for covalent modification by DACT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据