4.5 Article

Mechanisms related to the genotoxicity of particles in the subway and from other sources

期刊

CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY
卷 21, 期 3, 页码 726-731

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/tx7003568

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Negative health effects of airborne particles have clearly been shown in epidemiological studies. People get exposed to particles from various sources such as the combustion of, for example, diesel and wood and also from particles arising from tire-road wear. Another source of importance for certain populations is exposure to particles in subway systems. We recently reported that these particles were more genotoxic when-compared to that of several other particle types. The aim of this study was to further investigate and compare the toxicity of subway particles and particles from other sources as well as investigate some mechanisms behind the genotoxicity of subway particles. This was done by comparing the ability of subway particles and particles from a street, pure tire-road wear particles, and particles from wood and diesel combustion to cause mitochondrial depolarization and to form intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS). Furthermore, the genotoxicity and ability to cause oxidative stress was compared to magnetite particles since this is a main component in subway particles. It was concluded that the subway particles and also street particles and particles from wood and diesel combustion caused mitochondrial depolarization. The ability to damage the mitochondria is thus not the only explanation for the high genotoxicity of subway particles. Subway particles also formed intracellular ROS. This effect may be part of the explanation as to why subway particles show such high genotoxicity when compared to that of other particles. Genotoxicity can, however, not be explained by the main component, magnetite, by water-soluble metals, or by intracellular mobilized iron. The genotoxicity is most likely caused by highly reactive surfaces giving rise to oxidative stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据