4.7 Article

Enhanced removal of Cu(II) and Ni(II) from saline solution by novel dual-primary-amine chelating resin based on anion-synergism

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 287, 期 -, 页码 234-242

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.01.054

关键词

Dual-primary-amine chelating resin; Anion enhancement; Promotion index; Metastable-state model; Marginal effect

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of P.R. China [51378253]
  2. Discipline Crossing Foundation of Nanjing University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel dual-primary-amine chelating resin (EDTB) was newly synthesized for the effective removal of Cu(II) and Ni(II) from saline solutions. NaNO3 as well as Ca(NO3)(2), NaCl and CaCl2 unexpectedly promoted the adsorption of Cu(II) or Ni(II) by up to 63.42% or 133.49% in single heavy-metal species systems. Meanwhile, inorganic salts enhanced both Cu(II) and Ni(II) uptake capacities in binary heavy-metal species systems. Anions significantly increased the amount of adsorption sites by condensing the double electric layer. Interestingly, increasing Ni(NO3)(2) concentrations elevated the adsorption capacity of EDTB for Cu(II) by 2.10-11.69% in aqueous media without salts while in the presence of salts, rising Ni(NO3)(2) concentrations suppressed Cu(II)-adsorption by 2.42-7.68%. The marginal analysis of anion-synergism depending on salt concentrations quantitatively explained such opposite effects using a promotion index. Furthermore, the solid characterizations and a newly-proposed metastable-state model based on preloading experiments conformably indicated the reciprocal relationships between cations and anions involving site competition, displacement effect and anion enhancement. Because of such salt-enhanced removal performance and excellent regeneration efficiency higher than 99%, EDTB is potentially eligible for reusing heavy-metals from actual wastewaters especially containing high-concentration salts. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据