4.7 Article

Mature landfill leachate treatment by coagulation/flocculation combined with Fenton and solar photo-Fenton processes

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 286, 期 -, 页码 261-268

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.12.036

关键词

Biodegradability; Coagulation/flocculation; Fenton reagent; Landfill leachate; Solar photo-Fenton; Toxicity

资金

  1. EU [S0304-3894(14)01020-6, 228296]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitivity [S0304-3894(14)01020-6, CTQ2012-38754-C03-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work reports the treatment of a mature landfill leachate through the application of chemical-based treatment processes in order to achieve the discharge legal limits into natural water courses. Firstly, the effect of coagulation/flocculation with different chemicals was studied, evaluating the role of different initial pH and chemicals concentration. Afterwards, the efficiency of two different advanced oxidation processes for leachate remediation was assessed. Fenton and solar photo-Fenton processes were applied alone and in combination with a coagulation/flocculation pre-treatment. This physicochemical conditioning step, with 2 g L-1 of FeCl3 center dot 6H(2)O at pH 5, allowed removing 63% of COD, 80% of turbidity and 74% of total polyphenols. Combining the coagulation/flocculation pre-treatment with Fenton reagent, it was possible to reach 89% of COD removal in 96 h. Moreover, coagulation/flocculation combined with solar photo-Fenton revealed higher DOC (75%) reductions than single solar photo-Fenton (54%). In the combined treatment (coagulation/flocculation and solar photo-Fenton), it was reached a DOC reduction of 50% after the chemical oxidation, with 110 kJ L-1 of accumulated UV energy and a H2O2 consumption of 116 mM. Toxicity and biodegradability assays were performed to evaluate possible variations along the oxidation processes. After the combined treatment, the leachate under study presented non-toxicity but biodegradability increased. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据