4.7 Article

Enhanced photocatalytic oxidation of gaseous elemental mercury by TiO2 in a high temperature environment

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 289, 期 -, 页码 235-243

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.02.033

关键词

Photo-oxidation of Hg-0; Titanium dioxide; Calcination temperature; Irradiation strength; Oxygen content

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Republic of China [101-2221-E-110-058-MY3]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The photo-oxidation of Hg-0 in a lab-scale reactor by titanium dioxide (TiO2) coated on the surface of glass beads was investigated at high temperatures. TiO2 was calcinated at four different temperatures of 300 degrees C, 400 degrees C, 500 degrees C and 600 degrees C (noted as Ti300, Ti400, Ti500 and Ti600) and characterized for its physicochemical properties. The calcinated TiO2 coating on the glass beads was then tested to compare the photo-oxidation efficiencies of Hg-0 with an incident light of 365 nm. The results showed that the oxidation efficiencies of Hg for Ti400 and Ti500 were higher than those of Ti300 and Ti600. To enhance the photo-oxidation efficiency of Hg, Ti400 was selected to examine the wave lengths (A) of 254 nm, 365 nm and visible light with various influent Hg concentrations. The effects of irradiation strength and the presence of oxygen on the photo-oxidation efficiency of Hg were further investigated, respectively. This study revealed that the wave length (lambda) of 254 nm could promote the photo-oxidation efficiency of Hg-0 at 140 and 160 degrees C, while increasing the influent Hg-0 concentration and could enhance the photooxidation rate of Hg-0. However, the influence of 5% O-2 present in the flue gas for the enhancement of Hg-0 oxidation was limited. Moreover, the intensity of the incident wave length of 365 nm and visible light were demonstrated to boost the photo-oxidation efficiency of Hg-0 effectively. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据