4.7 Review

In situ aerobic cometabolism of chlorinated solvents: A review

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 283, 期 -, 页码 382-399

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.09.041

关键词

Aerobic cometabolism; Chlorinated solvents; In situ bioremediation; Modeling; Technology selection

资金

  1. European Commission [265946]
  2. Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation (FCT) via the Ciencia Program
  3. [PTDC/AAG-TEC/4403/2012]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/AAG-TEC/4403/2012] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The possible approaches for in situ aerobic cometabolism of aquifers and vadose zones contaminated by chlorinated solvents are critically evaluated. Bioaugmentation of resting-cells previously grown in a fermenter and in-well addition of oxygen and growth substrate appear to be the most promising approaches for aquifer bioremediation. Other solutions involving the sparging of air lead to satisfactory pollutant removals, but must be integrated by the extraction and subsequent treatment of vapors to avoid the dispersion of volatile chlorinated solvents in the atmosphere. Cometabolic bioventing is the only possible approach for the aerobic cometabolic bioremediation of the vadose zone. The examined studies indicate that in situ aerobic cometabolism leads to the biodegradation of a wide range of chlorinated solvents within remediation times that vary between 1 and 17 months. Numerous studies include a simulation of the experimental field data. The modeling of the process attained a high reliability, and represents a crucial tool for the elaboration of field data obtained in pilot tests and for the design of the full-scale systems. Further research is needed to attain higher concentrations of chlorinated solvent degrading microbes and more reliable cost estimates. Lastly, a procedure for the design of full-scale in situ aerobic cometabolic bioremediation processes is proposed. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据