4.7 Article

Selective removal of erythromycin by magnetic imprinted polymers synthesized from chitosan-stabilized Pickering emulsion

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 289, 期 -, 页码 28-37

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.02.030

关键词

Erythromycin; Pickering emulsion polymerization; Adsorption; Magnetic imprinted polymers

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21306013, 21107037, 21176107, 21004031]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China [BK2011514]
  3. National Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2013M530240]
  4. Postdoctoral Science Foundation [1202002B]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnetic imprinted polymers (MIPs) were synthesized by Pickering emulsion polymerization and used to adsorb erythromycin (ERY) from aqueous solution. The oil-in-water Pickering emulsion was stabilized by chitosan nanoparticles with hydrophobic Fe3O4 nanoparticles as magnetic carrier. The imprinting system was fabricated by radical polymerization with functional and crosslinked monomer in the oil phase. Batches of static and dynamic adsorption experiments were conducted to analyze the adsorption performance on ERY. Isotherm data of MIPs well fitted the Freundlich model (from 15 degrees C to 35 degrees C), which indicated heterogeneous adsorption for ERY. The ERY adsorption capacity of MIPs was about 52.32 mu mol/g at 15 degrees C. The adsorption kinetics was well described by the pseudo-first-order model, which suggested that physical interactions were primarily responsible for ERY adsorption. The Thomas model used in the fixed-bed adsorption design provided a better fit to the experimental data. Meanwhile, ERY exhibited higher affinity during adsorption on the MIPs compared with the adsorption capacity of azithromycin and chloramphenicol. The MIPs also exhibited excellent regeneration capacity with only about 5.04% adsorption efficiency loss in at least three repeated adsorption-desorption cycles. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据