3.9 Article

Experimental Study on In Situ Tissue Engineering of the Temporomandibular Joint Disc using Autologous Bone Marrow and Collagen Sponge Scaffold

期刊

JOURNAL OF HARD TISSUE BIOLOGY
卷 24, 期 2, 页码 211-217

出版社

JOURNAL HARD TISSUE BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.2485/jhtb.24.211

关键词

Temporomandibular joint disc; Regeneration; Bone marrow; Collagen sponge scaffold; Rabbits

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [JSPS-13358016]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24689073] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc plays an important role in mandibular motion. Once the TMJ disc perforates, spontaneous recovery does not occur. The aim of this study was to induce regeneration of the TMJ disc through an in situ tissue engineering method. Japanese white rabbits weighing 2.5-3.0 kg were used in this study. The TMJ was surgically exposed and a round full-thickness perforation of diameter 1.6 mm was made in the center of the disc. Animals were divided into A and B groups. In group A, a collagen sponge scaffold (1.6 mm in diameter with a height of 1.0 mm) was placed in the perforation. In group B, a collagen sponge scaffold mixed with autologous bone marrow was placed in the perforation. In both groups, a control perforation was made on the opposite side and left unfilled. The TMJ discs with surrounding tissues were collected 2, 4 and 8 weeks after surgery and were subjected to histological evaluation. In group A, after 4 weeks the size of perforation was reduced, but after 8 weeks, the perforation had still not completely closed. In group B, after 2 weeks, regeneration of the disc was seen and the site of the perforation was completely filled by new connective tissue. In the controls, after 8 weeks, the size of perforation was reduced, but it had not completely closed. The results indicate that collagen sponge scaffold with autologous bone marrow may have the potential to induce regeneration of a damaged TMJ disc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据