4.5 Review

A comparative study of single reference correlation methods of the coupled-pair type

期刊

CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 343, 期 2-3, 页码 217-230

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2007.07.001

关键词

electron correlation; coupled pair approximation; coupled cluster approximation; configuration interaction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several variants of coupled electron pair type approximations are compared with respect to their accuracy in the prediction of bond distances, harmonic vibrational frequencies and anharmonic corrections for a range of closed-shell diatomic molecules. In the first part of the paper the coupled-electron pair (CEPA) methods (CEPA/1,2,3) are discussed. Extensions of these methods allow the derivation of the correlation energy from the stationarization of a correlation energy functional (CPF/1,2,3 methods). All methods are formulated as diagonally dressed configuration-interaction with single- and double-excitations (CISD) eigenvalue problems. Averaging the diagonal shifts of the CPF methods in various ways lead to the ACPF and AQCC methods. Several small modifications of the shifts for the single excitations are proposed that enhance the stability of the methods (NCPF/1,2,3, NCEPA/1,2,3, NACPF). The reduced shifts are justified by linear response arguments. The implementation of the methods for a closed-shell ground state is described. In the application part, we first tested the size-consistency, exactness for two-electron systems and unitary invariance of the methods. Extensive numerical studies with polarized quadruple-zeta basis sets are employed to test the accuracy of the coupled pair approaches relative to the more elaborate quadratic CI (QCISD) and coupled-cluster (CCSD and CCSD(T)) approaches. Not surprisingly, the CCSD(T) method is the most accurate approach on average. However, the proposed NCPF/1 variant led to even smaller average errors for bond distances (similar to 0.2 pm relative to similar to 0.3 pm for CCSD(T)) while predicting still accurate harmonic frequencies (av. Error similar to 25 cm(-1) for NCPF/1, similar to 8 cm(-1) for CCSD(T) and similar to 45 cm(-1) for CCSD). All coupled pair methods are more accurate than present day DFT approaches (BP86, B3LYP). The exception is the recently proposed double-hybrid B2PLYP functional that approaches the coupled pair performance. Some more difficult copper containing diatomics are treated as well (CuH, CuF, CuCl and Cu-2). We discuss why we believe that the coupled-pair approaches (and in particular the proposed NCPF/1 variant) are attractive for large-scale chemical applications. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据