4.7 Article

Mobility and fractionation of REEs during deep weathering of geochemically contrasting granites in a tropical setting, Malaysia

期刊

CHEMICAL GEOLOGY
卷 349, 期 -, 页码 71-86

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.04.016

关键词

REE; Lanthanides; Granite; Saprolite; Tropical weathering; REE fractionation

资金

  1. Malaysian Research Grant [FRGS 03-12-10-1013FR]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study we describe the mobility and fractionation of REEs in two deep (up to 30 m) tropical weathering profiles developed on two granites from the Kuala Lumpur pluton, Malaysia, sampled at Cheras and Rawang. On the basis of Na2O and K2O both are S-type granites, but Rawang has higher CaO, MgO and FeO than Cheras and lower SiO2. With respect to Al-saturation Rawang is I-type and Cheras is S-type. We compared the two profiles in terms of total REEs, magnitude and changes in Ce and Eu anomalies, REE mobility and LREE/HREE fractionation. Rawang profiles have higher REE contents, display lower mobility for most except the heaviest REEs and show higher LREE/HREE fractionation than those from Cheras. These differences can be linked to differences in primary mineralogy and degree of weathering, the latter controlling the type and volume of secondary minerals. Specifically, bowl-shaped parent-rock-normalised patterns in the Cheras saprolites appear to be a result of apatite dissolution. Moreover, moderate weathering evident in lower Mineralogical Indices of Alteration (MIA) at Cheras has conserved parent rock REE patterns and fractionation factors in the saprolites. By contrast, more intense weathering observed in Rawang profiles has produced abundant kaolinite group minerals that have preferentially retained LREE, which consequently display high LREE/HREE fractionation. This study provides important insights into the factors controlling REE mobility during tropical weathering, and its potential as an indicator of weathering intensity. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据