4.7 Article

Zircon U-Pb geochronology and Hf isotope data from the Yangtze River sands: Implications for major magmatic events and crustal evolution in Central China

期刊

CHEMICAL GEOLOGY
卷 360, 期 -, 页码 186-203

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.10.020

关键词

Detrital Zircon; U-Pb and Hf isotopes; Continental crust; Yangtze River

资金

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB03020300]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [40930107, 41111140016]
  3. China Geological Survey: Continental Shelf Drilling Program [CSDP-2012-05]
  4. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization [IGCP-581]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In situ U-Pb and Hf isotope analyses were made on detrital zircons isolated from sands of the Yangtze River in order to understand the evolution and history of crust in that river basin. A total of 2277 detrital zircon grains were dated by the LA-ICP-MS U-Pb technique and 674 grains were also analyzed for Hf isotopes on the same spots of concordant grains. Our results show five major groups of U-Pb ages: at 2.4-2.6 Ga, 1.8-2.0 Ga, 700-850 Ma, 400-550 Ma and 200-300 Ma, which correspond to known granitoid magmatic events within the drainage (Liliangian, Jinningian, Caledonian, Hercynian and Indo-Sinian/Yanshanian). The initial Hf isotope ratios [epsilon(Hf)(t)] of the zircons exhibit a wide range from negative to positive for each of the five major age groups, revealing that existing crustal materials were mixing with variable volumes of new mantle melt at these times. Zircon Hf model ages (T-DM2) display two major ranges of crustal growth, one being Mesoproterozoic (1.0-1.5 Ga) and the other Archean-Paleoproterozoic (2.5-2.8 Ga). These zircons were mainly sourced from the Yangtze Craton and the Cathaysia Block, respectively. Crustal growth rates based on TDM2 model ages suggest that 30% of the present crustal volume was formed by 2.5 Ga, 48% by 1.8 Ga, 70% by 1.4 Ga and 96% was formed by 1.0 Ga. (C) 2013 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据