4.7 Article

Isotopic indicators of carbon and nitrogen cycles in river catchments during soil erosion in the arid Loess Plateau of China

期刊

CHEMICAL GEOLOGY
卷 296, 期 -, 页码 66-72

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2011.12.021

关键词

Carbon; Nitrogen; Isotope; Soil erosion; Loess Plateau

资金

  1. National Natural Sciences Foundation [40673012, 41073018]
  2. National Key Funds of China [2010CB833403]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZCX2-YW-149]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology [SKLLQG0921]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Water and soil erosion are serious issues in the Loess Plateau in China. The carbon and nitrogen cycles along river catchments during the soil erosion process have historically been poorly understood. In this study, we investigated the concentrations and isotopic signatures of carbon and nitrogen in river water, river-suspended materials and soil. Our results revealed that, in river catchments, from the water sources to their confluence with larger rivers, (1) the isotopic signatures of dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) varied from -9.2 to -6.7%. in May and from -12.9 to -9.3%. in August. In addition, delta C-13(DIC) values were more negative in August than in May. These differences may be related to changes in the source and soil erosion. (2) The NO3- nitrogen isotopic signature of the water ranged from 5.1 to 10.3 parts per thousand in May and from 3.5 to 6.4 parts per thousand in August. The delta N-15(org) of the suspended material also became more positive; similar trends can help us to understand the N cycle during soil erosion. Our investigation suggests that soil CO2/carbonates and soil NO3- are dissolved into the Loess Plateau rivers during rainfall and soil erosion. The concentration and the isotopic signatures of carbon and nitrogen in rivers can be used for the quantitative evaluation of carbon and nitrogen transfer from the soil to the Loess Plateau rivers. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据