4.7 Article

In situ U-Pb dating of micro-baddeleyite by secondary ion mass spectrometry

期刊

CHEMICAL GEOLOGY
卷 269, 期 3-4, 页码 386-395

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2009.10.013

关键词

Baddeleyite; Geochronology; U/Pb; Ion microprobe; Gabbro; Carbonatite

资金

  1. Instrumentation and Facilities Program
  2. Division of Earth Sciences
  3. National Science Foundation
  4. Directorate For Geosciences [0948724] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Earth Sciences [0948724] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We introduce a technique for U-Pb dating of baddeleyite using secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) in situ analysis of ng-mass crystals that cannot be efficiently extracted by conventional mineral separation techniques. Average Pb-207/Pb-206 ages for Precambrian baddeleyite crystals are within <0.3% of the respective isotope dilution thermal ionization mass spectrometry (ID-TIMS) ages. Pb-206/U-238 ratios are corrected for instrumental fractionation calibrated through linear regression in a Pb/U relative sensitivity vs. UO2+/U+ calibration plot. Calibration is performed on separated baddeleyite crystals (similar to 100-200 mu m in maximum dimension) mounted in random crystallographic orientation. Pb-206/U-238 ages for baddeleyite from Duluth gabbro (FC4b) and Kovdor are accurate within 1-2% when averaging 15-30 individual spot analyses and relative sensitivities calibrated on Phalaborwa baddeleyite. The relative difference of Pb-206/U-238 between large crystals and micro-baddeleyite from FC4b is within similar to 1%. Comparison between silicate glass and baddeleyite, as well as replicate analysis of the same grains in different orientations relative to the incidence direction of the primary beam support previous evidence for bias in Pb/U sensitivity in baddeleyite due to variable crystal orientations. We successfully utilized oxygen flooding and a UO2+/U+-based calibration to significantly reduce orientation dependent bias. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据