4.7 Article

Reworking of Hadean crust in the Acasta gneisses, northwestern Canada: Evidence from in-situ Lu-Hf isotope analysis of zircon

期刊

CHEMICAL GEOLOGY
卷 259, 期 3-4, 页码 230-239

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.11.007

关键词

Ancient zircon; Crustal evolution; Hadean; Lu-Hf isotope; LA-MC-ICPMS; Crustal reworking

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for Young Scientists

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Acasta Gneiss Complex of northwestern Canada comprises early Archean orthogneisses and includes the oldest known terrestrial rocks (3.94-4.03 Ga). Previous zircon geochronological studies revealed the presence of zircon xenocrysts with ages up to 4.2 Ga in the oldest rocks, indicating that the source of early Archean granitoids contained Hadean (>4.03 Ga) crust. In this study, we have determined the Lu-Hf isotopic compositions of zircon grains extracted from the early Archean Acasta gneisses to evaluate the extent of the Hadean crust contribution to the formation of these granitoids. Analyses of the Lu-Hf isotopes were carried out using in-situ laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry combined with cathodoluminescence images of the internal structure of the grains. Two ca. 3.59 Ga granitoids have epsilon(Hf)(T) of -2.4 +/- 2.2 and -3.2 +/- 2.5, suggesting that the source of the granitoids was extracted from the mantle as far back as 3.8 Ga. This is consistent with the presence of abundant zircon xenocrysts with ages up to 3.9 Ga. The Hf isotopic composition of a 3.72 Ga granitoid is significantly less radiogenic, with an epsilon(Hf)(T) of -6.1 +/- 2.5. This indicates that the granitoid formed by remelting of very old crust. The epsilon(Hf)(T) values for the two oldest rocks, the ca. 3.97 Ga tonalites, are -1.2 +/- 3.3 and -3.3 +/- 1.7, respectively, indicating that even the oldest known granitoids contain reworked older crustal materials. These results suggest that Hadean crust had significantly contributed to the genesis of some of the early Archean Acasta granitoids. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据