4.7 Article

Evidence for denitrification regulated by pyrite oxidation in a heterogeneous porous groundwater system

期刊

CHEMICAL GEOLOGY
卷 255, 期 1-2, 页码 60-67

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.06.005

关键词

Groundwater; Denitrification; Pyrite oxidation; Stable isotopes; Depth profiles

资金

  1. IRMS measurements

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Denitrification is an important natural attenuation process that has been observed in many fissured and porous aquifers. However, an important factor limiting denitrification in aquatic systems is the microbial availability of electron donors. Pyrite as the most abundant sulfide mineral in nature represents one of the potential electron sources for denitrifiers to reduce nitrate, but the reaction mechanisms coupling denitrification processes to pyrite oxidation are still questionable. We utilized hydrochemical data and stable isotopes of nitrate and sulfate in groundwater, isotope ratios of sulfur compounds in aquifer sediments and tritium based groundwater dating for assessing denitrification processes in a pyrite-bearing porous groundwater system. The oxic part of the aquifer with mean water transit times of approximately 60 years was characterized by nitrate concentrations of around 15 mg/l and delta N-15 values were similar to those typical for nitrification. In contrast, in the anoxic part with mean water transit times of up to 100 years, low nitrate concentrations accompanied by elevated delta N-15 values were observed. Furthermore, isotope data of groundwater sulfate and sulfur compounds in the aquifer sediment suggest that pyrite oxidation is the dominant source of sulfate in the aquifer. The trend of increasing delta N-15 values and decreasing nitrate concentrations in concert with depleted 6345 values of groundwater sulfate similar to delta S-34 values of pyrite, FeS2, suggests that denitrification is coupled to pyrite oxidation, particularly when water mean transit time is elevated. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据