4.6 Article

Experimental investigation of annular two-phase flow splitting at a microimpacting T-junction

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 118, 期 -, 页码 154-163

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2014.07.018

关键词

Phase split; Annular two-phase flow; Microimpacting T-junction; Surface tension; Viscous force

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51276068]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China [2013DFG60080]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An experimental study was conducted in order to investigate the phase split of annular two-phase flow at a horizontal microimpacting T-junction with the square cross section of 0.5 x 0.5 mm(2). A high speed record camera was used to help elucidate the fluid dynamics at the junction. Nitrogen and water at 120 kPa (abs) and room temperature of 22 degrees C were used as the test fluids. The inlet superficial velocities of gas and liquid varied from 13 to 30 m/s and from 0.018 to 0.08 m/s, respectively, covering a wide range of the inlet qualities between 0.23 and 0.58. The aqueous solutions of sodium dodecysulfate (SDS) and carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) with different mass concentrations were employed to study the effect of surface tension and viscous force on phase split, respectively. Experimental results showed that, the phase split of annular flow at microimpacting T-junctions was less affected by either the inlet phase superficial velocities or the viscous force, but varied largely with surface tension. Besides, the phase maldistribution of annular flow was smaller than that of slug flow and slug-annular flow at microimpacting T-junctions. Furthermore, when the present data were compared to those of mini- and macro-sized junctions at similar flow conditions, it was found that the phase maldistribution at microimpacting T-junctions was the smallest. Finally, good agreement was obtained between the present experimental data and a modification of an existing model. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据