4.6 Article

Hydrate formation and particle distributions in gas-water systems

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 104, 期 -, 页码 177-188

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2013.08.053

关键词

Gas hydrate; Particle distribution; Water-dominated; Under-inhibition

资金

  1. Chevron through Gas Process Engineering endowment
  2. University of Western Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Methane hydrate formation rate and resistance to Row were measured for gas-water systems in a high-pressure visual autoclave over a range of mixture velocities (300-5000 Reynolds number). A transition from a homogeneous to heterogeneous particle distribution, proposed following flowloop studies by others, was observed directly in the autoclave through three independent measurements: motor current increase (resistance to flow), pressure consumption rate (hydrate growth rate), and visual observation. The hydrate volume fraction at the transition, phi(transition), generally increased with increasing turbulence, although the relationship between Reynolds number and phi(transition), was not the same as that observed in flowloop experiments. The addition old thermodynamic inhibitor below the full inhibition threshold (i.e. under-inhibited) increased the transition point by about 10 vol% hydrate, without affecting the initial hydrate growth rate. A simple mass transport-limited formation model with no adjustable parameters was implemented to enable quantitative predictions of hydrate formation rate. In sufficiently turbulent systems the model's predictions were in excellent agreement with the observed growth rates. At lower Reynolds numbers, two mechanisms are proposed to explain the deviations between the observed and predicted growth rates. Prior to phi(transition) the low shear means that hydrate formation is limited by the rate at which the aqueous phase can be re saturated with methane. This rate is increased greatly by the formation of a hydrate bed after phi(transition), which increases the gas liquid interfacial area. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据