4.6 Article

Polydisperse granular flows in a bladed mixer: Experiments and simulations of cohesionless spheres

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 66, 期 9, 页码 1811-1824

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2010.12.022

关键词

Bladed mixer; Agitated drying; DEM; Segregation; Polydisperse flows; Granular flows

资金

  1. Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co.
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. DEM Solutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The flow and segregation of polydisperse, spherical particle mixtures in a bladed mixer was investigated using experimental and computational techniques. Discrete element simulations were able to reproduce the qualitative segregation profiles and surface velocities observed experimentally . For a binary system with a 2:1 size ratio, segregation by size occurs due to a sieving mechanism. Segregation in the binary system is fast, with a fully segregated system observed after just 5 revolutions. However, the numerical simulations showed that the extent of segregation in the bladed mixer can be reduced by introducing intermediate particle sizes in between the smallest and the largest particles. Addition of intermediate particle sizes increases convective and diffusive particle motion promoting a mixing mechanism that reduces segregation via the sieving mechanism. Void fraction with in the bladed mixer increases as the degree of polydispersity is increased allowing the particles to move more freely throughout the particle bed. Higher void fractions also increase the ability of large particles to penetrate deeper into the particle bed. Normal and shear stresses are also affected by particle size distributions, with lower average values obtained for the system with the largest number of particle species. Differences in the amount of stress generated by each particle species were observed. However, the difference in stresses is reduced as the number of particle species in the system is increased. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据