4.6 Article

The effects of the azimuthal position of the measurement plane on the flow parameters determined by PIV within a stirred vessel

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 65, 期 8, 页码 2454-2463

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2009.12.012

关键词

Mixing; Stirred tank; Pitched blade turbine; Impeller; PIV; Flow number

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (UK) [GR/S70517/01]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [GR/S70517/01] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two-dimensional particle image velocimetry (PIV) is usually used to determine the complex flow field in mechanically agitated vessels on the basis of measurements taken in a single vertical plane, thus, assuming axial symmetry. In this paper, we use 213 Ply to investigate the effects of the azimuthal position of the measurement plane in a fully baffled vessel agitated by a pitched blade turbine. Seventeen planes located at 5 degree intervals between two adjacent baffles are analysed. To maintain a high spatial resolution of 1 mm when examining each plane, a two-block approach is employed combining data from two fields of view to reconstruct the whole flow field. Time-averaged velocity and turbulent kinetic energy fields are obtained under fully turbulent conditions as a function of the azimuthal position of the laser plane. It is shown that the assumption of axial symmetry for such Eulerian fields is not fully justified within a fully baffled vessel, as there are considerable differences between planes. The results also show for the type and size of impeller used here, the importance of including both the axial and radial discharge contributions for an accurate evaluation of the flow number, otherwise it can be underestimated by up to 60%. The three-dimensional nature of the PIV measurements has also enabled the mass continuity to be accurately verified throughout the vessel. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据