4.6 Article

Butanol isomer separation using polyamide-imide/CD mixed matrix membranes via pervaporation

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 64, 期 24, 页码 5198-5209

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2009.08.034

关键词

Pervaporation; Membranes; Butanol isomer; Separations; Selectivity; Simulation

资金

  1. A-Star [R-398-000-044-305]
  2. SERC [092-139-0033]
  3. NUS [R-279-000-249-646]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) comprising polyamide-imide (PAI) and alpha-, beta- or gamma-cyclodextrin (CD) have been investigated experimentally and computationally for isomeric n-butanol/tert-butanol (n-BuOH/t-BuOH) separation via pervaporation. Consistent with molecular simulation, experimental results show that the CD inclusion ability and butanol discrimination ability are dependent on both CID cavity size and butanol molecular size. The PAI membrane incorporated with alpha-CD has the smallest cavity and has the highest discrimination ability for the n-BuOH/t-BuOH pair but with a low butanol flux. The mixed matrix membrane embedded with gamma-CD has the lowest selectivity and the highest flux. The PAI/beta-CD membrane has a comparable selectivity and flux, and exhibits preferential sorption and diffusion selectivity toward n-BuOH. A maximum separation factor of 1.53 with a corresponding flux of 4.4 g/m(2) h are obtained at an optimal beta-CD loading of 15 wt%. Further increments in the CID content eventually lead to a decrease in separation performance because of CD agglomeration and severe phase separation. To better understand the influence of CD on the separation performance of mixed matrix membranes, SEM, FTIR and XRD have been employed for membrane characterizations. The effect of n-butanol/t-butanol ratio in the feed composition has also been studied. It is found that both flux and separation factor decrease with increasing n-butanol content in the feed. The decline is attributed to the change in total vapor pressure at the upstream and the mutual drag effect of isomeric butanol molecules. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据