4.6 Article

Fluids mixing in devices with connected-groove channels

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 63, 期 7, 页码 1871-1881

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2007.12.027

关键词

microfluidics; mixing device; micromixer; confocal microscope; numerical simulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel connected-groove micromixer (CGM) has been designed, fabricated, and investigated thoroughly. Connected grooves in this device, crossing multiple sides of the microchannel induced an intensely transverse field of fluids, and thus generating rapid mixing than patterned grooves on a single side alone. The fabrication of a CGM was facilitated to overcome the complication of fabricating the sidewall and bottom grooves in a channel simultaneously; a CGM hence became highly efficient and compact. We propose here CGM of two types-CGM-1 and CGM-2-and compare their mixing performance with a slanted-groove micromixer (SGM) numerically and experimentally for Re over a wide range (1-100). Numerical analysis demonstrated that a CGM provided intense transverse components in the field and great mixing efficiency; in particular, CGM-2 with co-rotating flows encompassing the mechanisms of cutting and blending of fluids had a mixing performance over 50% better than an SGM for Re = 1-100. To systematically analyze the mixing by experiments, mixing of slightly viscous fluids, highly viscous fluids, and bio-fluids were adopted, respectively. The mixing experiments of stightly viscous dye solutions on the basis of the color uniformity of mixture showed that mixing lengths of both CGM were smaller than that of SGM. Based on the mixing results of highly viscous fluids, CGM-1 with sidewall grooves had a shorter pitch of spiral flow and more helical turns than an SGM. With a confocal microscope we explored the mixing sections of fluorescent proteins (B-phycoerythrin, BPE; Allophycocyanin alpha subunit, ApcA) inside a micronfixer to confirm the numerical results. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据