4.6 Article

Dynamic prediction of the bivariate molecular weight-copolymer composition distribution using sectional-grid and stochastic numerical methods

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 63, 期 17, 页码 4342-4360

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2008.05.047

关键词

copolymerization; molecular weight-copolymer composition; distribution; Monte Carlo method; two-dimensional fixed pivot technique; population balance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, a two-dimensional fixed pivot technique (2-D FPT) and an efficient Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm are described for the calculation of the bivariate molecular weight-copolymer composition (MW-CC) distribution in batch free-radical copolymerization reactors. A comprehensive free-volume model is employed to describe the variation of termination and propagation rate constants as well as the variation of the initiator efficiency with respect to the monomer conversion. Simulations are carried out, under different reactor conditions, to calculate the individual monomer conversions. the leading moments of the 'live' and 'dead' polymer chain length distributions as well as the dynamic evolution of the distributed molecular properties (i.e., molecular weight distribution (MWD). copolymer composition distribution (CCD) and joint MW-CC distribution). The validity of the numerical calculations is examined via a direct comparison of the simulation results, obtained by the two numerical methods, with experimental data on the styrene-methyl methacrylate batch free-radical copolymerization. Additional comparisons between the 2-D FPT and the MC methods are carried out for different polymerization conditions. It is clearly shown that both numerical methods are capable of predicting the distributed molecular and copolymer properties, with high accuracy, up to very high monomer conversions. It is also shown that the proposed dynamic MC algorithm is less computationally demanding than the 2-D FPT. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据