4.7 Article

A novel three-dimensional hierarchical NiCo2O4/Ni2P electrode for high energy asymmetric supercapacitor

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 354, 期 -, 页码 254-260

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.08.008

关键词

Asymmetric supercapacitor; Ni2P nanoneedles; NiCo2O4 nanosheets; Energy density; Electrodes

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51602131]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20160526]
  3. Jiangsu Province Postdoctoral Science Foundation [1601059C]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province of China [162300410201]
  5. Henan Provincial Department of Science and Technology Research Project [162102210303]
  6. Key scientific research projects of Henan Province [16A140014, 16A140016]
  7. China Postdoctoral Science special Foundation [2018T110449]
  8. Youth Backbone Teacher Training Engineering of Young Talent Cultivation Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Herein, a novel three-dimensional hierarchical NiCo2O4/Ni2P structure is successfully fabricated through a facile] hydrothermal and subsequent electrodeposition process. One-dimensional Ni2P nanoneedles decorate on two-dimensional NiCo2O4 nanosheets can effectively enhance the electrical conductivity and surface area of NiCo2O4 to promote fast Faradaic reaction. The optimized NiCo2O4/Ni2P-30 electrode exhibits a high specific capacity of 2900 F g(-1) at 0.008 A cm(-2). Moreover, an asymmetric supercapacitor (ASC) is fabricated by using the NiCo2O4/Ni2P-30 as positive electrode and activated carbon as the negative electrode, the device achieves an excellent electrochemical property with the energy density of 40.7Wh kg(-1) at 800Wkg(-1). Besides, the as-assembled device also exhibits an excellent cycling performance of similar to 92.0% of initial capacitance after 5000 cycles indicating its outstanding conductivity and structural stability. All of the results demonstrate that the hierarchical NiCo2O4/Ni2P composites are electrodes in energy storage application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据