4.7 Article

Mn-feroxyhyte: The role of synthesis conditions on As(III) and As(V) removal capacity

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 251, 期 -, 页码 192-198

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.04.033

关键词

Mn-feroxyhyte; Arsenic removal; Drinking water; RSSCT; Leaching tests

资金

  1. European Commission FP7/Research for SMEs AquAsZero [232241]
  2. European Social Fund (ESF)
  3. Greek State

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates the critical parameters of synthesizing nanocrystalline tetravalent Mn-feroxyhyte, a single-phase arsenic adsorbent equally efficient against As(III) and As(V). The production of such Fe/Mn oxy-hydroxides is based on the oxidative coprecipitation of ferrous and manganese ions through a continuous flow process. In particular, the effect of different reaction pH, redox potential and Mn incorporation percentage on the determination of structural and surface properties and sequentially on material arsenic uptake is examined. According to the experimental observations, total arsenic adsorption is maximized at acidic synthesis pH where the surface charge density is multiplied (2.7 mmol OH-/g at pH 4) and the chemisorbed sulfate's exchange with As(V) oxy-anions is activated. Besides, the capture of As(III) which lies on the intermediate oxidation of As(III) to As(V) provided by Mn(IV) surface ions, demands a high synthesis redox potential to obtain the tetravalent state and a Fe-to-Mn ratio around 3:1. The potential technological application of the studied materials was further investigated for the case which simultaneously optimize As(III) and As(V) removal capacity (synthesis pH 4, redox potential 600 mV and 12 wt% Mn). Rapid small scale column experiments indicate an almost equal adsorption capacity for As(III) (7.6 mu g/mg) and As(V) (8.7 mu g/mg) at the breakthrough point (10 mu g/L). Spent adsorbent of this procedure is categorized as non-hazardous waste according to TCLP or inert waste according to EN12457. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据