4.7 Article

Superior CO2 adsorption on pine nut shell-derived activated carbons and the effective micropores at different temperatures

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 253, 期 -, 页码 46-54

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.04.115

关键词

Biomass; Adsorption temperature; Activated carbon; CO2 adsorption; Narrow micropore

资金

  1. Tsinghua University-Veolia Environnement Joint Research Center for Advanced Technology
  2. Collaborative Innovation Center for Regional Environmental Quality
  3. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21177070]
  4. Laboratory Fund of Tsinghua University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pine nut shell-derived activated carbons were prepared at different KOH/C mass ratios and activation temperatures, and they were used to adsorb CO2 at different adsorption temperatures and pressures. The optimal activated carbon had the CO2 adsorption of up to 7.7 mmol/g at 273 K and 5.0 mmol/g at 298 K at 1 bar, the highest capacities at ambient pressure among all the biomass-derived carbons. The micropore distribution of activated carbons was highly dependent on the KOH/C ratio and activation temperature in the preparation. The activated carbons with larger micropores suffered the greater loss of CO2 adsorbed amounts at high adsorption temperatures. The accurate ranges of micropores responsible for CO2 adsorption at different temperatures were fully studied. When the adsorption temperature increased from 273 to 348 K, the ranges of effective micropore for CO2 adsorption at 1 bar narrowed from 0.33-0.82 nm to 0.33-0.52 nm. Under typical flue gas conditions at 348 K and CO2 partial pressure of 0.15 bar, the effective micropore range decreased to 0.33-0.40 nm, and the CO2 adsorbed amount was about 0.7 mmol/g on p-2-973-1.5. The accurate micropore ranges obtained are helpful in the preparation and selection of efficient activated carbons for CO2 adsorption under different conditions. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据