4.7 Article

Effect of ultrasound, thermal and alkali treatments on the rheological profile and water distribution of waste activated sludge

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 255, 期 -, 页码 14-22

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.06.036

关键词

Waste activated sludge; Rheology; Bound water; Ultrasound treatment; Thermal treatment; Alkali treatment

资金

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnologia [CTQ2009-11465]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Waste activated sludge is difficult to dewater, which hinders handling operations, such as pumping, transport and disposal. An accurate measurement of the distribution of water in sludge may help identify dewatering problems. Bound water, which is a gross estimate of several states of water including vicinal water, water of hydration and some fraction of interstitial water, is considered one of the primary limiting factors affecting sludge dewatering. In the present study, waste activated sludge was subjected to ultrasound, thermal and alkali treatments based on the assumption that these treatments can partially disintegrate sludge by disrupting flocs and cells and releasing interstitial water and organic compounds in the liquid phase, thus improving sludge dewatering. The three aforementioned treatments resulted in the reduction of the steady state viscosity and the hysteresis area of the sludge, and this reduction was more significant as the treatment intensity was increased. Likewise, the treatments also reduced the sludge elasticity and zero shear rate viscosity. Conversely, the bound water content increased when the treatment intensities increased because the organic matter released after sludge floc disruption created extra surfaces for water binding. Nevertheless, the centrifugation tests revealed that the three conditions of the thermal treatment (60, 80 and 90 degrees C) and the higher intensities of ultrasound (27,000 kJ/kg TS) and alkali (157 g NaOH/kg TS) treatments improved sludge dewatering by releasing the interstitial water. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据