4.7 Article

Preparation of porous PPy-TiO2 composites: Improved visible light photoactivity and the mechanism

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 236, 期 -, 页码 480-489

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.10.057

关键词

Composites; Macropores; TiO2; Polypyrrole; Photoactivity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21006008, 21206014]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT12JN07]
  3. Open Fund of Key Laboratory [2012LNSP02]
  4. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [21125628]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Novel hierarchically macroporous PPy-TiO2 composites were synthesized by polymerization of pyrrole with macro/mesoporous TiO2 as a photosensitizer and template. Complete hybridization was realized because the dual porous structure of the sensitizing material was efficient to infiltrate the pyrrole monomer into its interior and introduce UV photons penetrating the porous network for local polymerization. The collective performance favors the fabrication of hybrids with a well-adhered interface between the polymer monomer and the inorganic sensitizing material. The covalent bonding interaction between N and Ti atoms was proved by FTIR, XPS, Raman spectrum and elemental analysis. Mechanisms about the polymerization and interface interaction were discussed in terms of semiconductor photocatalysis. The photo response of the composites is shifted into visible light spectrum (2.67-2.92 eV), showing a band gap narrowing as compared to 3.18 eV of the bare TiO2. The sample of PPy-TiO2-24 shows the higher photoactivity and photocurrent than other composites and the TiO2 under visible light irradiation due to its ordered macropores, uniform PPy sensitizer layer, and relatively less hole-electron recombination rate. This work demonstrates the preparation of organic-inorganic composites with new nanostructures and enhanced visible light properties, and the mechanisms. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据