4.7 Article

Fabrication of nanostructured TiO2 hollow fiber photocatalytic membrane and application for wastewater treatment

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 236, 期 -, 页码 314-322

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.09.059

关键词

TiO2; Hollow fiber; Photocatalytic membrane; Wastewater treatment

资金

  1. Australia Research Council [DP110103533, DP110101185]
  2. University of Queensland [ECR605203, NSRSF605709]
  3. Australia Research Council
  4. Monash University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanostructured TiO2 hollow fiber photocatalytic membranes were fabricated in this study via a facile spinning-sintering method. The morphology, crystal phase, porosity and mechanical strength of the membranes were characterized by SEM, XRD, N-2 sorption and bending test, respectively. The dimensions of the sintered hollow fibers are approximately 1.0-1.2 mm in the outer diameter and 150 mu m in thickness. Finger-like macrovoids and sponge-like mesopores form inside the membranes whilst the TiO2 layer is denser near the outer wall of the membranes. The calcination temperature has a significant impact on the properties of the membranes. With increasing the calcination temperature, the pore size and photocatalytic activity decrease while the mechanical robustness increases. The photocatalytic activity, permeability and separation efficiency of the membranes were evaluated using both Acid Orange 7 (AO7) and raw sewage as pollutants. The membrane calcined at 900 degrees C has a good balance between mechanical properties and photocatalytic activity. A high organic removal rate of 90.2% is achieved by the filtration and photodegradation functionalities of the membrane. The water flux of 12.2 L m(-2) h(-1) for the membranes exposed UV irradiation is 2.2 times higher than that in the absence of it, which indicates lower levels of membrane fouling. The results provide vital insights into the development of photocatalytic membranes and their applications in water treatment. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据