4.7 Article

Environmental friendly technology for the removal of pharmaceutical contaminants from wastewaters using modified chitosan adsorbents

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 222, 期 -, 页码 248-258

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.02.048

关键词

Chitosan; Environmental friendly adsorbent; Grafting; Modeling; Pharmaceutical wastewaters; Pramipexole

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, new modified chitosans, cross-linked with glutaraldehyde and grafted with sulfonate (CsSLF) or N-(2-carboxybenzyl) groups (CsNCB), were synthesized and investigated as efficient and environmental friendly adsorbents for removing pharmaceuticals from polluted water matrices. To test the performance of these innovative chitosan-based sorbents, pramipexole dihydrochloride (PRM), a recently available non-ergot dopamine agonist was selected as model compound. Non-grafted chitosan was also prepared and used as reference adsorbent material for comparison with cross-linked (Cs) chitosan. Their characterization was realized via swelling tests, FTIR, SEM, and BET analysis. Alkaline conditions (pH = 10) were found to be the optimum for the adsorption process, while the reverse conditions (pH = 2) were optimum for desorption. The adsorption mechanism was also examined. Kinetic experiments were performed to study the effect of contact time on adsorption and the experimental findings were fitted to common kinetic models (pseudo-first, -second order and Elovich equations), in line with a detailed kinetic model, incorporating diffusion and localized adsorption and desorption steps. Isotherms showed the effect of initial PRM concentration and temperature (25, 45, 65 degrees C) on adsorption. Modified chitosans have a better behavior for PRM adsorption and the rate follows the order: CsSLF > CsNCB > Cs. The equilibrium data were fitted to the Langmuir-Freundlich model. The reuse of adsorbents synthesized was evaluated via sequential adsorption-desorption cycles. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据