4.7 Article

Evaluation of the salt removal efficiency of capacitive deionisation: Kinetics, isotherms and thermodynamics

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 223, 期 -, 页码 704-713

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.03.058

关键词

Capacitive deionisation; Voltage; Temperature; Electrosorption; Energy consumption; Charge efficiency

资金

  1. National Centre of Excellence in Desalination
  2. Australian Government through the Water for the Future initiative
  3. Water Quality Research, Australia
  4. University of South Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Capacitive deionisation (CDI) is an electrosorption desalination process with low energy consumption and less environmental pollution compared to other desalination technologies. Charge efficiency, defined as the ratio of the total amount of salt adsorbed during the purification stage over the charge exchanged between the electrodes in the same period, is an important property of CDI that affects the consumption of electrical energy. This study investigated the charge efficiency of a CDI stack with porous activated carbon electrodes under various operational conditions. Charge efficiency is directly related to flow rate and applied voltage and inversely related to feed solution concentration. The values of charge efficiency under various operational conditions were in the range of 65.5-70%. These results indicate the remaining of a fraction of ions in the electrode pores after the regeneration stage that represents the co-ions in the purification stage and consequently decrease the charge efficiency. The experimental results were validated by the Langmuir isotherm and pseudo-second-order adsorption kinetics. Thermodynamic parameters such as activation energy, change in free energy, enthalpy and entropy were calculated. Thermodynamic analyses indicate that the electrosorption of sodium chloride salt onto the activated carbon electrodes of CDI is driven by a physisorption process rather than a chemisorption process. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据