4.7 Article

A model on the CaO multicyclic conversion in the Ca-looping process

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 228, 期 -, 页码 1195-1206

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.05.023

关键词

CO2 capture; Ca-looping; Modeling; Thermal pretreatment

资金

  1. Andalusian Regional Government (Junta de Andalucia) [FQM-5735]
  2. Spanish Government Agency Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [FIS2011-25161]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The CaO conversion of CO2 sorbents subjected to repeated series of carbonation/calcination cycles is investigated as affected by thermal pretreatment. The behavior of nonpretreated sorbents is characterized by the progressive sintering of the initial CaO skeleton derived from a quick preheating of its precursor. As a consequence, CaO conversion suffers a drastic decrease in the first cycles and gradually converges towards a residual value. The evolution of conversion in the first cycles for pretreated sorbents is determined by a diverse mechanism, which is mainly characterized by the growth of a renewed soft skeleton due to promoted solid-state diffusive carbonation, which leads to an increase of conversion with the cycle number up to a maximum value. A mathematical model is proposed based on the balance between the surface area loss due to sintering in the calcination stage of each cycle and the surface area gain due to regeneration of the skeleton. A key feature to describe self-reactivation is that renovation of the soft skeleton becomes progressively less efficient as the number of cycles builds up. An extensive series of data reported in the literature has been analyzed in the light of the proposed model, which has served to quantify the level of self-reactivation as affected by a wide variety of experimental conditions such as preheating temperature and duration, hydration, calcination under a CO2 enriched atmosphere, grinding, addition of thermally stable dopants, and presence of foreign ions in the limestone. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据