4.7 Article

A novel integrated vertical membrane bioreactor (IVMBR) for removal of nitrogen from synthetic wastewater/domestic sewage

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 223, 期 -, 页码 908-914

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.01.096

关键词

Membrane bioreactor; Three-phase separator; Operation conditions; Nitrogen removal

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51038003]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment [2011TS08]
  3. Funds for Creative Research Groups of China [51121062]
  4. Special Funds for Foshan Science and Technology [2011AA10331]
  5. Industry-University-Research Collaboration Project of Chancheng District [2012107101169]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel integrated vertical membrane bioreactor (IVMBR) composed of both anoxic and oxic zones based on the installation of a three-phase separator was developed to simultaneously remove organic matter and nitrogen. The three-phase separator could successfully create favorable conditions for both denitrifying and nitrifying process, which occurred in upper part.(anoxic zone) and lower part (oxic zone) of the reactor, respectively. A lab-scale IVMBR was operated in parallel with a controlled MBR (without the three-phase separator), and their performance on the removal of organics and nitrogen was compared. The results show that both IVMBR and controlled MBR were efficient in removal of COD and NH4+-N when fed with synthetic wastewater or domestic sewage. IVMBR performed a better removal performance of NH4+-N and TN when the volume ratio of anoxic zone and oxic zone and internal recycle rate were around 1% and 400%, respectively. However, the TN removal performance of controlled MBR was quite poor due to the lack of anoxic condition. Additionally, it was found that IVMBR could save half of alkalinity compared to the controlled one. Overall, the IVMBR has the potential of being applied in the treatment of domestic sewage and ammonium industrial wastewater. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据