4.7 Article

Trace metals requirements for continuous thermophilic methane fermentation of high-solid food waste

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 222, 期 -, 页码 330-336

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.02.076

关键词

Methane fermentation; Trace metals; High-solid waste; Thermophilic; Food waste

资金

  1. University Grants Commission, Northwest AF University [Z109021206, Z111021201]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The amount of iron, cobalt and nickel required to perform thermophilic methane fermentation using high-solid food waste was examined in this study. To determine this, we devised and applied a theoretical consideration method. Three runs were performed using a completely stirred tank reactor. During the first run, start-up was carried out by decreasing the HRT from 100 to 50 and finally to 30 days, which corresponds to a COD loading rate of 1.9, 3.8 and 6.3 kg m(-3) day(-1), respectively. Four typical operational parameters the gas production rate, methane content, pH and total volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentration were stable except a temporary rise in VFA was observed when the HRT was decreased from 50 to 30 days, indicating that the system performed well with COD loading rate of 6.3 kg m(-3) day(-1). After day 57 (HRT: 30 days, COD loading rate: 6.3 kg m(-3) day(-1)), the reactor efficiency deteriorated due to the trace metals limitation. A combination of iron, cobalt and nickel (at 10, 1 and 1 mg L-I, respectively) was added to the reactor approximately every 45 days during the second run. The reduced gas production, methane content and pH were all restored to stable levels after regularly adding the trace metals. During the third run, trace metals were added to the substrate, and no limitation was noted at all. Based on the theoretical consideration and the experimental results, the most suitable values for Fe/COD, Co/COD, Ni/COD are 276, 4.96 and 4.43 mg kg(-1) COD-removed, respectively, for high-solid thermophilic methane fermentation of food waste. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据