4.7 Article

Ultrasound-assisted MnO2 catalyzed homolysis of peracetic acid for phenol degradation: The assessment of process chemistry and kinetics

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 221, 期 -, 页码 476-486

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.02.018

关键词

Peracetic acid; Electron spin resonance spin trapping (ESRST); Kinetics; Phenol; Experimental design; DFT calculations; Ultrasound

资金

  1. European Community activity Large-Scale Facility Wageningen NMR Center [FP6-2004-026164]
  2. Maa- ja vesi tekniikaan tuki (MVTT) foundation
  3. Academy of Finland [212649]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The combination of peracetic acid (PAA) and heterogeneous catalyst (MnO2) was used for the degradation of phenol in an aqueous solution in the presence of ultrasound irradiation (US). As a relevant source of free radicals (e.g. (OH)-O-center dot), peracetic acid was comprehensively studied by means of electron spin resonance (ESR) spin trapping (ST) techniques with the subsequent identification of free radicals by simulation based fitting (SBF) technique. The radical reaction mechanism, where hydroxyl radical was a primary product of O-O bond rupture of PAA, was established taking into account radical reactions, occurring during sonolysis. The potential barriers and the reaction heat were determined by basic density function theory (DFT) calculations to estimate whether the proposed radical pathway is possible. The assessment and optimization of the process parameters for MnO2/PAA/US system to eliminate phenol was accomplished with experimental design. Fractional factorial design (FFD) was executed to relate the removal efficiency of phenol with process parameters such as catalyst and PAA concentrations, the presence of ultrasound and the reaction time. The comparative kinetic study of silent and ultrasound-assisted processes revealed the significant difference between these two processes that was mainly attributed to the complex radical system formed during PAA homolysis. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据